[ Project Management, Info Systems, Business Analysis, Software, and More... ]

Book Review: Advanced Project Portfolio Management and the PMO

Blog Category: Professional — Blogged by: admin on August 25, 2008 at 9:43 pm

pmo.gifI recently slogged through an underrated little number called, ‘Advanced Project Portfolio Management and the PMO: Multiplying ROI at Warp Speed‘ by Kendall & Rollins.  Despite the fact that it reads (and sounds) like a whitepaper, it’s a good book which makes two points incredibly well:

1) Too many organizations try to save money on projects (cost efficiency) when the benefits of completing the project earlier far outweigh the potential cost savings.

You might, for example, be able to complete project X with perfect resource management (all staff are perfectly busy!) in 100 days for $1 million. Alternatively, you could hire some extra people and have them sitting around occasionally at a total cost of $1.3 million, but the project would be completed in only 60 days.

What’s that 40 day difference worth? Well, if the project is strategic in nature, it could be worth everything. It could  mean being first to market with a new product or possessing a required capability for an upcoming bid which you don’t even know about yet. It could mean impressing the heck out of some skeptical new client or being prepared for a surprise audit. Sometimes the benefits outweigh the cost savings.

2) Project management exists only to better deliver benefits and capabilities. It doesn’t exist for its own sake, it’s not some kind of innately useful, primordial thing. If it isn’t helping deliver benefits and capabilities, then you can send the whole rattling project management caravan off the side of a tall cliff.

This is where so many organizations get themselves into trouble. They hire a bunch of project managers and demand they follow this or that methodology. But why? Is it because — well — this is what everybody else is doing? Or is it because this methodology will deliver 15% more projects with the same resources? Or this methodology will reduce project cycles by 20 days? Is anybody even measuring these things before/after implementing all these processes?

If you’re going to go down the project management road (and you should!), you need to understand why you’re doing it, and how you’re going to measure your success (hint: throughput!).

434 pp. Recommended.

Related posts:

  1. Book Review: Alpha Project Managers After using his super PMP study guide some time...
  2. Product-Service Innovation: The Creative Project Manager (Part 1) Project managers are usually thought of as analytical types...
  3. Freud & Versioned Development: Reducing Project Risk w/Psychology In Steve McConnell’s classic, ‘Rapid Development,’ he talks about the...
  4. Book Review: The Five Dysfunctions of a Team I finally got around to reading another one of Patrick...
  5. PM Podcast: Measuring and Managing Project Quality Cornelius Fitchner has put together another great episode over at...

4 Comments »

26

Comment by Demian Entrekin

August 26, 2008 @ 12:47 pm

At the risk of sounding flip, I just want to say that I love it when someone, anyone, uses the word primordial. It makes me think of crude little creatures squirming around in a salt pond a few hundred million years ago. While “throughput” is certainly part of the story, it might inadvertently suggest quantity over quality.

Perhaps it sounds simplistic, but the “why” for PPM is really quite simple. Here’s how I would explain it to the Executive. “You are spending X dollars on Y projects to achieve Z results. How do we improve X and Z? Let’s start with visibility and measurement and go forward from there.”

27

Comment by admin

August 26, 2008 @ 8:08 pm

Well said Demian, and I’m right with you: primordial is a great word :-)

So what are the PPM measurements which you consider essential?

28

Comment by Demian Entrekin

August 26, 2008 @ 11:04 pm

In the private sector, it’s usually about competitive advantage as a means of driving profitable revenue. In the public, it’s usually about providing services via a transparent budget for the taxpayers. From there, the key is to pick measurements that the budget owners can make sense out of. You need to get them to help you pick.

51

Comment by PM Hut

January 20, 2009 @ 2:15 pm

#2 is spot-on. Methodologies are useless if they can’t get the work done. The whole point of Project Management is getting the project done, and it seems that some Project Managers out there are overseeing this point, for the sake of applying a certain PM methodology.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
:)